Tags

, , , , , , ,


Let’s see.  Who has more credibility, Judge Andrew Napolitano, or the deep state?

Does Fox News realize that the decision to suspend Napolitano raise a red flag against those forces colluding against a sitting president?

Independent Sentinel by S. Noble

On March 14th, Judge Napolitano made a startling accusation on Fox & Friends, accusing President Obama of using the UK to spy on Donald Trump. For those comments, he has been suspended indefinitely though he is sticking by his story.

”Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command” to conduct the surveillance on Trump, he said.

The judge didn’t explain if these are retired or currently employed sources or if they have any direct knowledge.

Obama “didn’t use the NSA, he didn’t use the CIA, he didn’t use the FBI, and he didn’t use the Department of Justice,” Judge Napolitano explained. The former president went to the British intelligence services version of the NSA for the work – the GCHQ.

The GCHQ shares much of the NSA’s vast electronic database of signals intercepts and they would be able to gain access to records of Trump’s phone calls the judge said. It would also mean there are no fingerprints left behind, he explained.

The President’s press secretary Sean Spicer read Napolitano’s report at a press conference[…]

Continue Reading

Advertisements