, , , , , ,


Hillary Clinton during Harry Reid’s send off Thursday in the U. S. Senate, issued a clarion call for an all-out war against “fake news.”

Still refusing to take responsibility for role in her failure to break through the glass ceiling, Clinton insisted that “This is not about politics or partisanship but was rather a life or death issue. Lives are at risk. Lives of ordinary people just trying to go about their days to do their jobs, contribute to their communities…It is a danger that must be addressed and addressed quickly.”

Poor baby.  NOT!  Tyranny, criminal antics and the flaunting of the law by the Obama administration, the call to action of Black Lives Matter by members of the DNC, the illegalities and acceptance of foreign donations by the Clinton and the collusion and propaganda of their media collaborators was just the tip of the iceberg but that tip was big enough to guarantee Clinton’s failure which no one saw coming because of fake news reports by the media.

And so, there is the call to silence fake news outlets.  However, Crooked Hillary is not talking about reigning in the alphabet channels and cable news networks, all of whom are in her pocket and that of fellow globalists.  Bitter Hillary wants to silence the watchers on the wall aka the sentinels aka watchdog organizations and often referred to as citizen bloggers.

It is the likes of Judicial Watch, Conservative, Independent, alternate media and bloggers who did the research, spent hours combing through tens of thousands of emails released by Wikileaks, shared and reported their findings across social media where the news grew legs spreading across the world corporate media/propagandists who were complicit in a cover up of epidemic proportions would not.

This is about doing an end run around Obsidian Finance Group v. Crystal Cox in which the Ninth Court of Appeals rules that bloggers were entitled to the same First Amendment liberties as journalists, something that until this day does not sit well with Progressives and journalists.

The protections of the First Amendment do not turn on whether the defendant was a trained journalist, formally affiliated with traditional news entities, engaged in conflict-of-interest disclosure, went beyond just assembling others’ writings, or tried to get both sides of a story. As the Supreme Court has accurately warned, a First Amendment distinction between the institutional press and other speakers is unworkable: “With the advent of the Internet and the decline of print and broadcast media . . . the line between the media and others who wish to comment on political and social issues becomes far more blurred.”

How far are the global elites willing go to control the narrative while ignoring fake news that corporate media sock puppets has presented for decades as fact.

Speaking of which, there is David Brock, Media Matters man who obviously took one hell of a licking this past election season and who despite all the fake news presented as fact on Media Matters is not on the list of “fake news” sites presented by an anonymous organization of ex-government employees by the name of PropOrNot.

As pointed out by Roving Journalist, Michael Tracey, He runs a bunch of websites that may seem to the naked eye to be legitimate “news” sources, but in reality are just Democratic Party / Hillary agitprop conveyor belts. This is well known and accepted, even by Hillary’s inner-circle, many of whom view Brock with suspicion…”

Setting the record straight:

MORE EXAMPLES OF FAKE NEWS, as continues to be selectively overlooked by those calling for so-called fake news to be reigned in.


I rest my case.