Tags

, , ,


This advertisement was offered as a direct response to an anti-Israel advertisement that was displayed on MTA property by a pro-Palestine group. The MTA approved the anti-Israel advertisement, which portrayed the Palestinians as being on the side of “peace and justice.” However, the MTA rejected AFDI’s advertisement, claiming that it violated its “demeaning” speech restriction.

AMERICAN FREEDOM LAW CENTER (AFLC)

Earlier today, Federal Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, sitting in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, ruled that the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s (MTA) restriction on “demeaning” speech was unconstitutional.  The MTA had refused to run an anti-jihad advertisement that, according to the MTA, referred to Israel’s enemies as savages who engaged in jihad.  The MTA flagged the advertisement that was set to run on the exterior of its buses, claiming that it violated the MTA’s policy against displaying ‘images or information that demean an individual or group of individuals on account of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, gender, age, disability or sexual orientation.’

Read the judge’s order and opinion here.

READ FULL ARTICLE

*This advertisement displayed in this post was a direct response to an anti-Israel advertisement posted by a Pro-Palestinian group.  The MTA approved and allowed the anti-Israel poster to be displayed on its MTA property but rejected the advertisement pictured above claiming that it violated its “demeaning” speech restriction.

IN THE MEANTIME THE ANTI-ISRAEL PROPAGANDA ADS  ARE ON CONTINUED DISPLAY IN NEW YORK

About these ads