Yeah, Definitely Political: Guns, Obama, Joyce Foundation: Targeted SCOTUS Decisions – Funded With Lies, Stifled Descent


, , ,


Maggie’s Notebook by

It’s good to remember the holes from where Barack Obama scratched his way to the surface. Here’s one of them. The Joyce Foundation. Barack Obama and the Joyce Foundation started laying the ground work to derail the Second Amendment during Obama’s leadership 1994 – 2002. There was a clear path for doing this at Joyce. They targeted future Supreme Court decisions and began funding lies and deceptive law articles about the individual right to keep and bear arms. At the bottom of the article, take a short look at how Fast & Furious follows this same pattern. It’s too easy to forget.

Bob Owens at Pajamas Media (please read the entire important article).

Joyce’s directors found a vulnerable point. When judges cannot rely upon past decisions, they sometimes turn to law review articles. Law reviews are impartial, and famed for meticulous cite-checking. They are also produced on a shoestring. Authors of articles receive no compensation; editors are law students who work for a tiny stipend.

In 1999, midway through Obama’s tenure, the Joyce board voted to grant the Chicago-Kent Law Review $84,000, a staggering sum by law review standards[…]

Hundreds of parents flood Vegas board meeting to fight ‘comprehensive’ sex ed proposal


, , , , , ,


EAG News by Victor Skinner

LAS VEGAS – Parents in the Clark County school system sent a very strong and clear message to the school board Tuesday: Don’t change the sex education curriculum.

The Clark County School Board spent about seven hours on a special public forum on the district’s sex education curriculum, primarily about whether to go to an “opt-out” format with “comprehensive” sex education – rather than the current “opt-in” abstinence-focused approach, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reports.

The question about “opt out” – which would provide sex ed to all students except those whose parents request otherwise – is irrelevant because state law requires parental consent for the lessons. The Tuesday meeting was called in part to gauge parental interest in lobbying lawmakers to shift to a “opt-out” system….

Continue Reading



Suggested reading: EDITORIAL: CCSD must halt effort to subvert parents on sex education (Review-Journal)



Trump Defends the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution – Cherish and Preserve It


, , , ,

BEFUNKY Screenshot DonaldTrumpNRAConvention003

2nd Amendment

A well – regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to kepp and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


The Liberal News media, Democrats, many Republican journalists and TV anchors continue tooting their old worn out song, “Where’s Trump’s Policies?” Well to date he has established and shared his policy on illegal immigration, taxes, ISIS, defunding a portion of Planned Parenthood and his stance on the right to bear arms.

Donald Trump does in fact honor the 2nd Amendment; he believes Americans should have the “Freedom and Rights” as honored in our Constitution. Here is Donald’s complete policy on arms – it is perceptible that Donald Trump has given a lot of thought to this policy.

Donald J. Trump on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

The Second Amendment to our Constitution is clear. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed upon. Period.

The Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right that belongs to all law-abiding Americans. The Constitution doesn’t create that right – it ensures that the government can’t take it away. Our Founding Fathers knew, and our Supreme Court has upheld, that the Second Amendment’s purpose is to guarantee our right to defend ourselves and our families. This is about self-defense, plain and simple.

It’s been said that the Second Amendment is America’s first freedom. That’s because the Right to Keep and Bear Arms protects all our other rights. We are the only country in the world that has a Second Amendment. Protecting that freedom is imperative. Here’s how we will do that:

Continue Reading

E.R. Williams stays up on all critical issues that Americans are facing in our Country and here is his take on Donald Trump’s 2nd Amendment policy.

When our forefathers created the Constitution (our legal roadmap,) they realized that the Government needed stringent guidelines. The Constitutional Convention was held in Philidelphia starting on May 25th to September 17, 1787. On September 17th, 1787 the Constitution was signed, sealed and delivered to the citizens of the United States protecting them from an oppressive Government along with protecting their freedoms and rights.

The Government was actually crafted for Americans giving them a voice. In all actuality, the Government established by our forefathers was to be a Government of the people, for the people and by the people.

At this time I’m going to savor my freedom of speech and suggest that whatever you do, don’t vote for a political “insider” who is owned by the lobbyists and big donors. Don’t let money buy another “Presidency.”

Remember ISIS and other terrorists groups are in our midst; keep your guns close, protect your family, friends and fellow citizens.

May God Bless America

As Always

Little Tboca

Sharia Law vs the Constitution of the USA


, , ,

The U S Constitution

By Little Tboca

Religion is definitely a part of many lives in our United States and our forefathers knew that religion and politics don’t mix and should not be included in the Laws of our land (Constitution.) They instinctively created laws that would establish separation of religion and Government in order to prevent religious beliefs from governing citizens of our Nation.

The framers of the Constitution, although many were religious men knew that religion must be kept separate from the laws governing our land. First and foremost religion is one of the most controversial subjects and to include religion into the Constitution as part of the framework in our Constitution would be strategically a very devastating combination to combine religion and law.

Only once is religion briefly mentioned in our Constitution (Article VI.) and it clarifies that religion can’t be used as a qualifier for holding office or public trust in our United States.

Article VI

All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

This leads us to a very controversial discussion then of why those following and living by Sharia Law can’t hold the office of Commander in Chief. It is critical to understand that Sharia Law is a combination of religion and Government law; Sharia Law isn’t just a religion.

As President John F. Kennedy once said:

“We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people”.

Sharia Law encompasses all of the above because to many it is laden with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies and competitive values. Thus, it is up to the people to do their homework and make their own determination if they would be willing to elect a person who lives by Sharia Law. It is not a religion of peace, because followers of Mohammed are told that they are to “kill the infidels” wherever you find them. The teaching of Mohammed is exactly the religious foundation that ISIS is operating on in 2015. They believe they’re following the explicit instructions of the Prophet Mohammed.

Sharia Law is a combination of religion and governing laws all wrapped up in one neat package. Unlike the United States where religion and the Constitution are separate, Sharia Law is the daily “Bible” that Muslims use; it comprises much more than religion because it covers all aspects of one’s life.

Mohammad crafted the Quran which, as mentioned earlier covers much more than religion – it covers all types of behavior of the Muslim people including their private lives, their public lives and any personal beliefs they may have…

Sharia Law and the Constitution are structurally different, (1) The Constitution is the laws of our land and does not include religion, and (2) Sharia Law controls all aspects of a followers’ life including his personal and public life. (Covers religion and laws of the land)

Here is what one could expect of a Muslim President who practiced Sharia Law – notice that women in particular seem to be a focal point.

  • Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
    • Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
    • Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
    • Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
    • A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
    • A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
    • A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
    • A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
    • Girls’ clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad‘s words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
    • A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
    • A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband’s consent to divorce.
    • A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
    • Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
    • A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
    • A woman’s testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man’s.
    • A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
    • A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
    • A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
    • Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah – i.e., be Halal.
    • Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
    • The list goes on.

It may be a surprise to many but Sharia Law is practiced within the confines of our Nation.

( – Iranian American Lisa Daftari says that some Muslims follow Sharia Law in our Nation. Iranian American: ‘Sharia Law Is Here in the U.S.’

The State Of Texas Accepts Sharia Law, And Will Have the First Sharia Court in the United States – this can be studied at

Do Muslims Believe Sharia Law Supersedes the U.S. Constitution? The Fox News Insider (Hannity)

Will Sharia Law be the laws of our land in the future or will Americans insure that religion and politics do not mix. So far our Constitution has been the foundation of our Nation; it seems unwise to even consider changing this wonderful roadmap (Constitution.)

May God Bless America

As Always,

Little Tboca

#IAmAChristian: Dr. Ben Carson Lights Up Facebook in Response to Oregon School Shooting

dr benjamin carson I am a Christian



Dr. Ben Carson, a 2016 GOP presidential candidate and world-renowned neurosurgeon, has launched a social media response effort to the Oregon gunman’s reported targeting of Christians in his shooting spree on a community college campus on Thursday.

In one of several consecutive Facebook posts, Carson urges his millions of followers to change their Facebook photograph to an image of a hashtag: #IAmAChristian. The other Facebook photograph shows Carson holding up a piece of paper with the words “I am a Christian” written on it….















I am a Christian


The Curious Case of Oregon Shooter Chris Harper-Mercer – A Social Media Profile Shaped, Modified and Deleted…


There is a whole lot of scrubbing going on.

Originally posted on The Last Refuge:

The Oregon Shooter is a 26-year-old black male.

Birth Certificate Name is: Christopher Sean Mercer – 07/26/1989.
Mother:Laurel Margaret Harper – 04/05/1951
Dad:Ian Bernard Mercer – 05/15/1960
Divorced in 2006

oregon shooter 10 momoregon shooter 11 dad

oregon shooter 9 color black

REAL IMAGE (left)  – CNN IMAGE (right)

On the left is the selfie Christopher Mercer uploaded to his social media. On the right is how CNN presented the same selfie in broadcast stories about him.  Why did CNN need to change the complexion (color) of their broadcast?  Why is no-one showing pictures of mom, Laurel Margaret Harper.

Why change to hyphenated name?  Real name is Christopher Sean Mercer.  Media using Christopher Harper-Mercer and Chris Harper-Mercer.

View original 944 more words

Could Umpqua students/staff be armed!



Umpqua Community College Google


Just received the following email from Bob Trent, retired border agent and thought it worth sharing.


Maybe if they’d fix the info they post on their website…. sounds like a prohibition to me if they don’t mention the CHL exemption.

It was posted that way in March (via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine) and more recently via Google’s cached search results.

Campus Sign verbiage begins here-

Dangerous Devices

Possession, use, or threatened use of firearms (including but not limited to BB guns, air guns, water pistols, and paint guns) ammunition, explosives, dangerous chemicals, or any other objects as weapons on college property, except as expressly authorized by law or college regulations, is prohibited.

Possession of knives with a blade longer than 4” is prohibited.

Brandishing weapons is prohibited.

Misuse of personal defensive weapons – e.g., pepper spray, etc. is prohibited. The owner is responsible and accountable for any misuse of these devices.

Unless one carefully dissects the verbiage, one would think any gun possession was unlawful. This had to have been written by someone that is highly educated, and possesses a good human psychology background.

A single gun in front of this lunatic shooter might, just might have prevented the loss of life.

Please tell me of a single incident where lawfully permitted person to have a gun on any campus committed anything like this.

Now tell me how many lunatics did this type of serial killing within the past ten years. Go ahead, tell me!

Even if you are not pro gun carry, being in lawful possession of a firearm by a person licensed to do so is a far lower risk than this shooter. Plus it might save you, or any innocent person.

Gee whiz, how clever is that sign.

In other words, while it may be now, Umpqua Community College was not a gun-free zone.


ARMED Air Force Vet Was on Umpqua Campus Was NOT ALLOWED to Assist Victims!


, , , ,

Umpqua Community College logo

This whole thing stinks. Umpqua was not a gun-free zone.

H/t BB via TMH.


4-year-old girl in Conn. found wandering streets as mom left tot alone to perform sexual favors: cops

4-year-old girl in Conn. found wandering streets as mom left tot alone to perform sexual favors: cops

Police released a photo of Shi’Day Nicks’ daughter after struggling to identify the child. When questioned, the little girl didn’t know where she lived and said she dressed herself that morning. Photo: Hartford Police Department

New York Daily News

Hartford Police Department Police released a photo of Shi’Day Nicks’ daughter after struggling to identify the child. When questioned, the little girl didn’t know where she lived and said she dressed herself that morning. A 4-year-old girl found wandering the streets of Connecticut Tuesday morning had been left home alone while her mother turned tricks for cash, authorities said. Shi’Day Nicks, 22, said she left out sandwiches and snacks for her little girl and put cartoons on TV before slipping out of her Hartford apartment for a sexual rendezvous as her daughter slept, according to court documents Instead of […]



Secret Service Smut: Ed Lowery Viewing, Leaking of Jason Chaffetz Application

congressman jason chaffetz

Maggie’s Notebook by Maggie

The Secret Service has turned into a Gestapo, running wild and dirty. What smut haven’t we heard about them? Until now, we hadn’t heard of a possible move to blackmail a sitting Congressman. As Rep. Jason Chaffetz chaired the House Oversight and Reform Committee investigating Secret Service involvement in soliciting prostitution, abuse of alcohol, and White House security breaches –– while protecting the president –– just minutes after the hearing began, close to fifty members of the Secret Service agency viewed confidential information about Chaffetz once applying for a job with the agency. Seems there was no “there there.” One week after the hearing, Ed Lowery blamed his own “stress and his anger.” Typical smutty democrat-run agency […]

Talk about one heck of a fall from grace for the Secret Service.

A Bureaucrat Testifies to Where Student/Teacher Data is Sent & For What Purpose. Confirmed: It’s Cradle to Grave.


, , , , ,

2010-CCSSO-Powerpoint - The importance of Metadata according to CCSSO

The importance of data according to CCSSO. Question: Who is the conductor? And did the orchestra hire him/her?

Missouri Education Watchdog by

The blueprint for data retrieval has been in plain view for quite some time now if legislators and citizens were curious to know how/why data was being gathered on students and teachers. Some legislators (Republican and Democrat) scoffed at the idea on why parents would be alarmed that their child’s personally identifiable information was being disseminated to unknown entities without parental knowledge and/or permission, and attempts at data privacy bills were stalled by Republican leadership on the state level. A September 2013 MEW post, Common Core Standards and Data Collection Connection, described what data collection included, the purpose, the funding of the systems and how it aligned to the Common Core Standards:

The Common Core proponents say the standards are only that: standards. They contend they have nothing to do with the Longitudinal Data Systems and personally identifiable data collection.From The CCSSO and a question about data collection:

Are there data collection requirements associated with the Common Core State Standards?

There are no data collection requirements of states adopting the CCSS. Standards define expectations for what students should know and be able to do by the end of each grade….


Read full article



Standardized Assessments: Fact vs #EdReform Talking Points


, , , ,


LEX Assessment


Missouri Education Watchdog by

Do you have concerns if the assessments used in your states and for students are valid and age appropriate? Your state can crow about *excellent* assessment results but as you as a parent can’t access the assessment questions (and neither can your school), how do you know these results are valid and your student is learning anything of value?

Gerri K. Songer published (September 2015) a study she performed on the ACT, SAT, PARCC and SBAC using Lexile scores. This is quite different than the nebulous *college and career ready* talking points we hear from ed reform NGOs and state/local educational bureaucrats touting why these assessments are critical to this readiness. Songer’s report deserves a response from supporters of the CCCSSI on why their reform, based on theory and not actual research/facts, is preferable to a study using a scientific method which in antithetical to the proponents’ talking points.

You can find more on her research….

Continue Reading




Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 458 other followers